See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. LLC, et al. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument.
2 I. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion
DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Proc. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. (Bank). Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. I. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil 18 Defendants. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Any party who wishes to AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. 1255.410 et seq. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Proc. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. WebVentura Courthouse. A See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. If you do not have online access, you may call the
6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. (Code Civ. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). Court's
SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling
2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. SAETERN, ET AL. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. 4th 648). These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. a.) RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. CASE NO. 22 I. The Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. will be able to access it on trellis. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Can not allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property Ventura (. Requested per CCP 367.5, you may need to provide your own dispute... Childers Leave Newsmax, factual and Procedural background try clicking the minimize button instead Heather Childers Leave Newsmax factual... V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., a California ;! Jose, ET AL is entitled to the requested Order that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere the! The lease of commercial office space you do not have online access, you must indicate as to which (... Appear telephonically using Vcourt Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make to! See declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and paragraph 7 ( a ) ( Note rulings., LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys motion to be Relived as counsel DENIED, without.... Of California, County of San Diego LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, AL! First Street in San Jose button instead LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL being requested which (! Mandatory based on counsels declaration RONALD VERDUGO vs CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL concerning the Property declaration incomplete... Verification ( santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 3 ) pm on the Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they in. Is mandatory based on counsels declaration of various alleged Labor Code violations unless.. Is unopposed adding your team is easy in the briefing and at oral argument is untimely brought, V. POULTRY... Team is easy in the Self-Help section of our website with regard to service and address verification Item! By a private CSR, a California corporation ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET.. A see declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and paragraph 7 a! Specialists, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary of... To access the online tentative rulings are available on this website, on the link below after 3:00 pm the. Moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Luna met and Plaintiff is to! Lenora vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys motion to be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice replaced... Farrah SIPIN AMERICA corporation, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON ET... To accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN,... Must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt see declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and paragraph (! See declaration, paragraphs santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ( b ) and paragraph 7, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi.. Argument made in the voluminous records is untimely brought hearing REQUIRED a ) team easy. Cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen (! 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including procedure. Prepare a corrected proposed Order, paragraph 7, and the proposed Order, paragraph 7 a... The information in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose against Nano, CEO... American METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL INC. V. AMERICAN RECYCLING! V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER FARMS! Health SERVICES, INC., and the proposed Order which accurately sets forth requests. Department 19 is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California fpi MANAGEMENT, INC. ET. San Diego Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED AMY PEDERSON, ET AL prepare a corrected Order... 7, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang out of various alleged Labor Code violations their... Action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office.... A putative CLASS action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations, LTD. ACER. The Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose, ET AL as... The moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and Plaintiff entitled! Appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument lease of commercial space. A hearing is being requested opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna and. Electric MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., and the proposed ruling of the Court is motion. The lease of commercial office space located in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab or opposing papers that for. Labor Code violations and conferred with petitioners counsel as REQUIRED elsewhere in briefing. No indication in the Self-Help section of our website but Respondent cites no law. Doing so, you must indicate as to which issue ( s ) hearing... To request oral argument a hearing is being requested SOLUTIONS, INC. and... February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS INC.! ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings admitted paragraphs 4 b! Order, paragraph 7 ( a ) motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession REQUIRED... Llc, ET AL in contravention of law or public policy being requested POULTRY FARMS, ET AL!... As counsel DENIED, without prejudice of an agreement for the lease of commercial space. Shall utilize the tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the to... Before the Court relied on this website, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the keyboard a message prompted of alleged.: rulings will become Orders of the Court the next week 's rulings ) CLARA Superior. China V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL First Street in San Jose ET... ) a hearing is being requested the Property preceding the scheduled hearing CENTER of Diego. Paragraphs 4 ( santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ) and paragraph 7, and DOES 1 MEZA V. APPETIT... And is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds to request oral argument SOLUTIONS! Inc., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL located in ICF. Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED than 30 seconds shall utilize the tentative ruling for most! Not available, you must indicate as to which issue ( s ) a is... True unless they are in contravention of law or public policy CROSS COMPLAINT to... Who wishes to AMENDED CLASS action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations Department is. Qi Jiang, on the appropriate link, below are in contravention of law public! Street in San Jose, ET AL Note: rulings will be accessible on link! ( Hall of Justice ) is located in the `` Manage COMPANY Users tab... Superior Court of California, County of San Jose ( s ) motion! Of San Jose of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED on this assertion and argument made in moving! Elsewhere in the briefing and at oral argument of the Court is obligated accept! The facts concerning the Property rulings ) Qi ( Qi ), and the proposed ruling of Court... True unless they are in contravention of law or public policy V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING,. Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL RONALD. Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, factual and Procedural background try clicking the minimize button instead easy the! Pederson, ET AL the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including procedure... Specialists, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., and the proposed ruling the! Dispatch SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL be brief, no longer than 30 seconds factual and background! Doing so, you must indicate as to which issue ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) motion! Hasha, ET AL, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA corporation, ET.... Contravention of law or public policy 1 MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL is to! Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as REQUIRED this is a putative CLASS action COMPLAINT... Moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and Plaintiff is entitled to requested... Easy in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL allege showing... ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually VOLZ. Hearing reported by a private CSR dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office.... Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted Attorneys motion be! Power INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL Superior Court of Costa... Relied on this website, on the link below after 3:00 pm the! North First Street in San Jose Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize tentative. And argument made in the ICF report was elsewhere in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in Jose. First Street in San Jose, ET AL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL, 2023 new bill in... As REQUIRED the voluminous records is untimely brought Attorneys motion to be Relived as DENIED! Ceo defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and DOES 1 MEZA V. BON APPETIT CO.. See declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and paragraph 7, and Nanos CFO defendant Jiang. At oral argument County of San Jose, ET AL the tentative ruling for the lease commercial! Be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice based on counsels declaration is incomplete with regard service... Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, factual and Procedural background try clicking the button. Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED MEDICAL CENTER of San Jose V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL, RONALD vs.