.

When I wrote my last Manifesto blog, I said that I would tell you more about the background to my thoughts on corporate power and the banking system – part of the development of Sir Morgan Mammon and the Pirate. Sometimes, I’ll expand my Manifesto blog like this instead of just going through it line by line. I think it’s terribly interesting!

The American Constitution = an economic document to make the rich richer. It was based on the belief that the private rights of property come before government.

During the Revolutionary War, the soldiers had been paid in IOUs which were practically worthless after the war  because nobody believed they would be honoured. The American government decided to redeem them at par. Speculators were told of this before the soldiers. There was an orgy of corruption as shrewd businessmen ripped off the old soldiers and bought up the IOUs very cheaply.

The prime mover in these transactions was Alexander Hamilton one of the ablest and most important men in history. There is no evidence that he was personally corrupt, indeed he left office a poor man. He came from poverty but despised democracy and greatly admired England for its aristocracy. He deliberately promoted corruption which he believed was necessary to give the rich the influence they deserved. Through promoting corruption, he created a plutocracy richer than any aristocracy or monarch had ever been. America became home of the millionaire while a male school teacher earned $15 a month, teachers $1.25 a week.

Hamilton was not alone in his beliefs. Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.”  So said Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild international Banking Dynasty in 1790.

This attitude dominated 19th century American economic philosophy  – and paved the way for men like Jay Gould, Pierpont Morgan, Andrew Carnegie and JD Rockefeller in  the ‘Gilded Age’ (from after the Civil War until the early 20th century).

And now for some of the personalities who shaped and dominated the Gilded Age. We start with Jay Gould, a thug – and a railroad developer and speculator who became the 9th richest man in American history. He was involved in the largest railway financial operations in the United States from 1868-1888. He threatened and bribed legislators to do what he wanted. During a massive railway strike, he hired strike breakers. According to labour unionists, he said at the time, “I can hire one-half of the working class to kill the other half.”

Gould in turn, fell prey to the robber baron Pierpont Morgan. During the Civil War he sold defective guns to the Union army at inflated prices, and he installed a telegraph line in his office so he could buy and sell gold based on battle news from the front. After the war, he brought the same shrewd instinct to his goal of monopolizing the railroads and established a banking empire which still exists today.

Rockefeller is important, not through his ideas, which were those of his contemporaries, but through his purely practical grasp of the type of organization that would enable him to grow rich. By the mid-1880s, JD Rockefeller was refining and transporting 90% of America’s oil – establishing a monopoly over the entire industry. He had done a deal with the railways to transport his oil at half the price of his competitors. This was good for the railways because once he achieved his monopoly their overheads were drastically reduced. His methods were soon copied by other industrialists who wished to create monopolies.

As soon as he had the contracts with the railways, Rockefeller set to work on other refineries, offering to buy them up at his own valuation. Rockefeller very gently, very kindly, as if deeply concerned with their welfare, would strongly advise them to sell. “Take Standard Oil stock and your family will never know any want,” he would say; and if that failed, he would add, mysteriously: I have ways of making money you know nothing about.” One by one they yielded in fascinated terror.

Andrew Carnegie, the most important person in the development of the steel industry, could be as deliberate as Rockefeller in crushing his competitors—and more aggressive in crushing his workers’ attempt to unionize. After first supporting the right of workers to unionize, he gave his plant manager a free hand in beating back the new American Association of Iron and Steel Workers when the union tried to organize his steel plant outside Pittsburgh. He was a “republican in politics but a monarchist in business”.

At the end of 1900, Morgan bought out Carnegie for $400,000,000. “Mr Carnegie,” he said, “I want to congratulate you on being the richest man in the world.” Carnegie was an exception who then spent the last 20 years of his life giving his money away.

The whole foundation of what happened in the 20th century was laid down in the 19th century by these American monopolies. They are the same people.

Some have called the Gilded Age a time of great progress. Now look at the Manifesto:

Pirate. Leave everything to me. I plunder for you. Stick with me and you might get a share of the bounty. My name is Progress. 

AR. But you have stolen imagination. There is hardly anyone left now who believes in a better world. What is the future of unlimited profit in a finite world?

To see 3 great films which address the importance of our awareness of the world and the issues of economic sustainability– stream them free at http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

Share this post

fb-logo-sm
Tweet
  1. Once again a thoroughly interesting insight to your manifesto, and the world in general.

    I believe the concept of private owners coming before government and indeed the general public is still something very prevalent in the modern United States. Britain benefits from the NHS whereas the US thrives on the knowledge that people will pay solely for their own health care. This may not be exactly the same as the business monopolies but I believe this idea definitely shines through in my example.

    A thoroughly interesting and informative read, Vivienne, many thanks

    James

    (and I’ll certainly take a look at those films!)

    Comment by James Emmett on 04/02/2011 at 6:47 am

  2. Was there a problem with my comment (below) which first I posted on Friday?

    Hi everyone!

    I really like the way you’re explaining the manifesto like this. I did find it very layered, so to see parts teased out like this really helps to understand deeper.

    I’ve got a few things to share with everyone:

    Firstly as this is ACTIVE resistance I’d like to invite you all to come to a screening of Zeitgeist next Friday which I am organising. It will be held at the Really Free School 9pm on Friday 11th Feb 2011. Its in central London and you’re all invited so long as you’re not members of the press. Friday is the last day but there are plenty of other things to do there, so please take a good look at the website. http://reallyfreeschool.org

    Secondly, my daughter, Dalia and I went to get our AR badges yesterday, woopie! I’ve pinned mine to my hat and she has two on her coat, the “Dangerous Animal” and “I’m expensive” ones.

    Now for the more theoretical thing I’d like to share:

    The mention of IOUs reminded me of Chief Guaicaipuro Cuatemoc address to the heads of state of the European Community. In his speech he explains that the Conquistador’s looting of Central American gold and silver should now be acknowledged as an IOU…

    “To celebrate the fifth centennial of the IOU, we can ask: have other European brothers make rational responsible or even productive use of these amounts so generously advanced by the International Indo-American fund?
    Sadly the answer is ‘No’ – in their campaigns they squandered it on invincible Armadas, in Third Reichs, in every form of mutual extermination. They have been unable, despite a 500 year moratorium, to repay the principal and interest …

    “Let it be clear that we do not stoop to charging villainous leech rates of 20% and up to 30% that the European brothers charged the peoples of the third world. We merely require the return of the precious metals advanced, plus the modest accumulated interest of 10% for a period of 300 years with a 200 year period of grace.

    “On this basis, and applying the European formula compound interest, we advise our ‘discoverers’ that they owe us, as initial payment on the debt, a mass of 185,000 kilos of gold and 16,000,000 kilos of silver. As for the interest, we are owed 440,000,000, 000,000,000 kilos of gold and 38,000,000,000,000,000,000 kilos of silver.

    “To infer that Europe, in half a millennium has not been able to generate sufficient wealth to pay off this modest interest, would be to admit that abject failure of its financial system and the demented irrationality of the premises of capitalism.

    “Such metaphysical questions, however, do not disturb us Indo-Americans.

    “But what if we were to require the signing of a letter of intent to discipline the indebted peoples of the Old world, and to oblige them to fulfil their obligations … as the first step in the repayment of this historic debt.

    Comment by Simon McAndrew on 07/02/2011 at 11:58 am