Vivienne’s Diary – 25.08.20 – updated

The whole  now functions under Corruption: politic, economic, legal.

The Mueller report is ‘fait accompli’, eg of Am Pragmatism: fit the victim 2 the crime + if you find the perfect victim the public will believe the crime. (Over the last 10 yrs the press created a pariah persona 4 Assange but the US still has not found a crime 2 fit him 2. They have 19 counts and none of them fits they R all rubbish).

The Mueller Investigation, commissioned on behalf of the Democrats, was a fake 2 prove Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election; faked also 2 prove that Wikileaks colluded with the Trump campaign to publish the leaked DNC and Podesta emails at a critical juncture.

These leaks concern the emails between, Hilary Clinton (Podesta, Chair of her election campaign) and the DNC (Democratic National Committee – the committee who decides the Democratic candidate for President. The ones who made sure it was Clinton and not Bernie Sanders.) It is devised 2 take the spot light off Clinton’s corruption, using a catch of red herrings.

Julian Assange has repeatedly declared the material did not come from the Russian state or from any other state and he has physical proof of this. He was very willing 2 give evidence to Mueller, which could have been done by video-link, by interview in the Embassy or by written communication.

Mueller is a criminal + the Mueller report is deeply corrupt and it’s being quoted by the Press as if it’s irrefutable evidence. The purpose of the report has been to deliberately and systematically exclude all investigation into the true facts.

The problem is the is riddled with corruption and disease; and the Democrats are as corrupt as the Republicans. This report is an example of  democratic corruption.

• Seth Rich – DNC employee, suspected of giving the information to Wikileaks which means it was an inside job. Not proven; Mueller had no interest in investigating this lead, he has no interest in proving anything outside of his theory – the Russians. All we know is Rich was killed.
• Mueller did not interview Bill Binney (former intelligence official for the NSA – National Security Association, the other secret service is the CIA.) A hacker works remotely, but as Bill Binney explains, the speed needed to download the information from the DNC servers shows the hack had to have been done on site, in person, and removed by a device by memory stick, therefore by an employee – inside job.
• Mueller did not collect the DNC servers which contain the full trail of communication as evidence and they were never examined. Officially we have no idea of whether there was a whistleblower. How can you have a report without an investigation?
• Mueller did not interview Julian Assange even though Assange states he had “physical proof” the material did not come from Russia.
• Mueller did not produce one shred of evidence to prove his predetermined conclusion that the Russians did it. He hired Crowdstrike (IT analysts) and he supplied them with the material to investigate which showed signs of Russian interference which in fact were plants by the CIA. https://www.itnews.com.au/news/wikileaks-dumps-cia-malware-obfuscation-code-456864
• People have heard so much about ‘Guccifer 2.0’ and GRU hackers, but it’s a total red herring. Mueller indicted 12 Russians he alleges are GRU hackers responsible for the “hack”of the DNC and Podesta leak. (“GRU” is Russia’s largest foreign intelligence agency.) Mueller put these Russian names  (he must have pick them at random from a telephone directory) before an US court in absentia charged with being hackers, and was taken aback when it turned out these people were real people with real jobs who didn’t work for GRU + had their legal representatives at court to refute the charge. He had to back down and ask for an adjournment that stopped the case.
• Roger Stone is a red herring, he contacted Julian at Wikileaks 7 months after the election claiming he could appeal to people at the highest level on Julian’s behalf in the future, yet Mueller fished around pretending that their conversation had affected the election. Journalist’s won’t leave it alone. Don’t believe them, believe us. It’s not left or right, it’s up or down. The ones who know and the ones who don’t.